• Explore
  • Proposals
  • Pool
  • Login
  • Sign up
avatar

cardeegel

12 Followers
2 Following
  • Blog
  • Comments
  • Replies
  • Connections
  • Wallet
avatar
@cardeegel 0
1 day ago
This proposal is about allocating additional SPS to staking rewards. So if anything, this is going against the whitepaper, by prolonging the staking rewards which are set to…
0
0
0
    0.000 ONEUP
    avatar
    @cardeegel 0
    4 days ago
    I would argue emissions can be reduced by offering alternatives to SPS rewards as well. Why not have the option for rewards to be purely in glint, for those who just want to get…
    2
    0
    0
      0.001 ONEUP
      avatar
      @cardeegel 0
      6 days ago
      I'm absolutely against allocating any more SPS for staking rewards. Why should the DAO reward the mere holding of SPS, if on the other hand it wants to be paid for the mini-set…
      0
      0
      1
        0.000 ONEUP
        avatar
        @cardeegel 0
        16 days ago
        Until it hits 0.1425 cent you simply overpay when you use any other form of currency. By a lot. Imagine you are a new player, wanting to buy a pack, you have most likely credits…
        0
        0
        1
          0.000 ONEUP
          avatar
          @cardeegel 0
          16 days ago
          I voted for it and I like the idea in general, but the whole pay different prices in DEC, SPS and USDC is really bad in my opinion to say it in a neutral tone. Realistically…
          3
          0
          1
            0.022 ONEUP
            Menu
            Explore Proposals Pool
            Trade
            Trade ONEUP