RE: LeoThread 2025-08-29 17:19
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
It's one whale tied to blocktrades. They think that leo.voter is selling votes through premium.
LEO is favoring voting for authors based on money paid to LEO. This isn't hidden, it's out in the open. I've seen direct statements from Khal saying that the way to get more votes is to buy a subscription, for example:
0
0
0.000
They're not really wrong, but they are like the pot calling the kettle black. The best way for HIVE and LEO both to win would be for Hive to change their tokenomics as Leo did! Hive whales will likely not do that. 🤣
https://inleo.io/@khaleelkazi/undefined?referral=khaleelkazi
They have a point but it's how you deal with these situations that really counts. Both sides are huffing and puffing at each other over stupid issues and neither wants to deal with the other side.
Meanwhile they try to say that the other side is totally wrong and everything that they do is wrong for hive. Give out, and make everybody look unprofessional and brings down the reputations of everybody involved.
Both teams are trying to build great things here but they approach it in very different ways which causes this conflict.
It's more personal conflicts than anything else. Clashing personalities.
Would be so much better if everyone pulled in the same direction. At least generally.
That’s not how premium works
Premium shows you in the feeds more which makes you more likely to get frequent curation. PeakD and Ecency both have the same “pay 4 visibility” mechanics — PeakD lets you straight up buy a slot and Ecency has points to promote yourself
We just do it through a recurring subscription
Also, the Alpha account isn’t a whale. It’s blocktrades’ alt account
Not so #alpha behavior - at least not in my book.