RE: Splinterlands Recent and Interesting News: Custom Challenges, New Contests Rules, Inleo Partnership (ENG/ITA)
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
After sharing about HIVE on Reddit, even commenting and receiving a few opinions, it now seems so obvious, HIVE really isn't an investment in itself. Returning to the fact that HIVE is the best choice for P2P transactions due to its relatively low cost, however, it seems that now you also “don't deserve” the 50%, whose remaining 50% already becomes HIVE POWER. Wouldn't it be better to punish those who only Power Down again? I'm wondering if I'll stick with this project in the long term.
0
0
0.000
Hi @ifhy I honestly don't understand your point of view
Hive is a DPOS = delegate proof of stake
Stake matters but everyone has full freedom to do what they want with their stake including voting or not voting or power up or power down.
Splinterlands is a Hive-based game and has received support from the Hive community especially with the SPL DHF proposal.
In your opinion if Splinterlands decides to reward and support more those who have medium to long term goals on Hive and those who have assets of Splinterlands is wrong? and why?
This is not about punishing but incentivizing to support the ecosystem from which we receive support.
Do you think someone who has, for example, 0 HP but received 17K HP (author rewards) and has no Splinterlands assets should be supported in the same way as someone who has staked a good portion of HP and has Splinterlands assets?
No one is against power down but those who extract so much compared to what they receive objectively have no interest in Hive or at least not as much interest as those who choose not to extract or extract 50%.
I think you are a little confused and don't know the terms punishment, dpos and stake.
Is not giving an upvote a punishment for you?
While giving 0 support to the ecosystem is okay?
In real life if a person takes 300 but gives 50 back he is a selfish person to me. Is he a generous person to you?
Explain to me why if Splinterlands decided to reward people who do power downs but not too many powerdowns and have growth goals should be such a bad thing. I am curious
Hi @libertycrypto27
You don't need to understand any more, unfortunately some people who abandoned this were right. **No, I'm not talking about those crazy people who get Downvotes or are caught by Hivewatchers. But people who take the time to really be part of the HIVE ecosystem. After all, this is Web3 and Investment, right? But it's funny that people who don't interact with the blockchain at all, or rather even post topics in automatic mode and don't reply to those who comment, get so much reward. While people like me, even if they dedicate themselves to it, engage and create something, can't be entitled to the remaining 50%.
**And I've never done a PowerDown so far.
I really have a lot of people to thank here, as well as the curators who have always supported us, the Brazilian community and of course the gods unchained and gaming community. But the more you apply yourself in HIVE, the more you understand how “DAO” really works, not fair governance. A while back someone commented that you just had to “increase your HP” to be part of the governance, right. Let's compete against the whales that have been there since the beginning. That answer was so stupid that I should have saved it in an image.
Hi @ifhy I like to compare myself with those who have different ideas from mine and I also like to help others understand the mechanisms of Hive because I was also a new user and I also had a lot of difficulties in the beginning.
My first posts earned 0 rewards and didn't get the attention I thought I deserved but most importantly I didn't know Hive like I do now.
But my biggest mistake was that I only looked at and weighed the content of my posts against others then, also thanks to the advice of more experienced hivers I understood the way to grow on Hive and my results were getting better and better.
On Hive the content of a post is only one of the important factors because to grow on Hive the important elements are in my opinion:
If you do not give importance to each of these factors, it is not the fault of others or Hive but simply that you have not thought much about what Hive is and what is important to do.
To help you I looked at your activity on Hive and I hope you will appreciate my advice because it is only meant to help you
Growing up on Hive is not immediate and requires a lot of commitment especially of time.
I try to write 20 comments per published post
If I don't read and comment on other authors' posts why should other authors comment on mine?
You have published 165 posts and wrote 479 comments
Your level of interaction is too low and you are not making connections with others
I never delegate more than 25% of my HP and support more than 80 authors on a weekly basis
Why should others support me if I have no interest in supporting others?
So far you have received 1961 HP as support from the other Hivers but (probably you were delegating your HP before) you have supported the other authors with only 5 HP. But you complain that you do not receive support
Growing on Hive is not easy and it takes time but it is very rewarding for me because I can write what I want and if my content is liked I can be rewarded.
Did those who left Hive find their fortunes elsewhere? Tell me so I can go too... :)
Hive is not perfect and has aspects to improve but do you know of other blockchain projects that allow you to be rewarded for writing content?
I hope you will find my advice helpful and I have shown you the path I followed from 0 HP to 75K HP.
It was not an easy or immediate path but it took me time and effort.
Are you sure you put in the same effort?
Will and can and if you put in the effort you will see that you will grow very fast but you have to focus more on yourself and not on others also because an account that started 5 years ago and has a major stake will most likely have put in a lot of effort in the past.
I honestly didn't understand here what you mean by 50%.
Explain yourself better
I understood what you indicated, the problem was that I delegated 95% of my HIVE POWER, and then I couldn't get the return for other authors, although I'm supporting other projects I think. Although the comments seem low, I think you could compare with other profiles in the same niche, I think I still have +50% of the comments than the others.
About the 50% I'm saying, it's about some people trying to dictate what to do with the earnings, I'm referring to the 50% Hive Power - 50% HBD post payment. Certain people tend to say what to do with the 50% in HBD.
Thank you for your attention. @libertycrypto27
If you keep looking at those who do worse than you do and earn more than you do, you won't get very far.
If an author earns more than you and writes content that is not as good as yours and interacts less than you do be sure that over time you will outgrow him.
When I had little HP I looked at those who had more HP than me wrote short content, now many of those accounts have much less HP than me. If I had stopped to compare myself to those who were worse me I would not be here. You have to look at who does better than you and who you admire for what they do if you want to improve at least that is what I do in real life.
Who are these people? I in these 5 years have never heard anyone say what to do with HBD.
Not directly, but I bet you've read the phrase:
"Hive Leechers, who withdraw their Liquid Hive to Exchanges without keeping a part for Stacking"
It's the same thing as telling you to hold on to your HBD, after all, you only get your Hive after changing your HBD.
I'd rather end this conversation here and mention the authors of that phrase. This avoids downvotes and enemies.
Thanks for the chat, have a nice afternoon or evening, I think you're @libertycrypto27 Italian LOL.
@ifhy I honestly think one thing:
You are not a Hive leechers because you kept HP in your wallet.
I honestly don't see any diktat in a user not wanting to support those who sell all their HIVE and consider them Hive Leechers, it is his personal opinion and personal choice not to support these accounts and with his stake he can choose who to support or not.
Likewise, I don't understand your point of view and why you are so concerned.
Until now you have had no interest in supporting other authors but:
Can Splinterlands freely choose what to do with its HPs exactly as you do?
Or should Sprinterlands delegate all of them as you have done so far and not support you, me and many other accounts?
When you criticize the possible “ missing” HP support of others you must be the one who wants to support others first wirh your hp.
That's why your criticism is only generated by your own interests and for that reason it is unliberal and also presumptuous because you don't do what you want others to do.
Have a nice day and work on your auto-criticism (my opinable opinion)