Splinterlands is awful.
Prologue
Mr. Plot wrote a post today about the negatives of Splinterlands. The positives, too, but not in a responding way, more like a Black & White theme. As I was writing my response, the latter escalated more and more towards a full blown post, so I stopped and started writing what you're reading right now. Or listening to, read to you by a very confusing German/French accent-English.
Argument 1: Pay-2-Win
Heavy financial investment required for competitive play excludes casual gamers.
Depends on how high you want to compete. If you want to be Number 1, sure, you have to invest a lot. Big surprise there, but the Olympics also exclude casual athletes. If you really think you can "compete" on the highest level without investing a serious amount of time and money, well, you might just be a little bit spoiled.
I have a Silver/Gold (now cald Intermediate/Advanced I think) modern deck, and an expert Wild deck. I don't really play Wild besides tournaments, I let the bot handle that when I don't have time to play modern. In Modern, I play Diamond League. That's high. And it requires a lot of skill and tactics to compete with my deck there, and if I'm not having a good day, I lose. That's reality.
There are no trophies for participating, and there shouldn't be.
Argument 2: Declining Card Values
Older cards (Alpha, Beta) lose value due to new releases and format changes.
I wish. Yes, they declined in value from when the whole thing started. I guess, I don't have the data to back that up. But with the latest Land-Updates and what is coming, it is quite hard to get those cards at a price that makes sense economically - most of them are overvalued considering the current status quo.
I'm happy that those prices are dropping at the moment, as I'm trying to scoop up whatever I can with the money I have, as land usage is increasing and those assets will be more valuable in the future. This is not financial advice, in case you think I'm a fortune teller. It's conviction, not clairvoyance, based on what the team is working on and the impact that other updated had on card & land prices.
Argument 3: Profit-Driven Focus
Monetization prioritizes revenue over gameplay, alienating non-investor players.
I really don't see that. Maybe I don't get the argument as it's very short. But with Foundation cards, that argument as I understand it was wiped away. With 1$/5 CC packs, it was wiped away. Yes, revenue is important - it is and always will be a business. You can't run servers on good game-play. You can't pay for updates with good attitude. A crypto/NFT based game needs money.
The team has done a lot to make the game a lot friendlier to non-investor players. (And, additionally, where's the line for "investor"? $100? $1000? $10,000?) They're true to their word that they want Splinterlands to be newcomer-friendly, and no newcomer is an investor. It's dipping toes and seeing what goes, and that's what the team has been catering for the last months - while as well catering to the legacy & high stake players with many updates and events.
Argument 4: Technical Issues
Server lag, transaction errors, and mobile app bugs disrupt gameplay.
Yes. There's always something to work on. I, personally, haven't encountered any of those lags and/or errors that weren't caused by my VPN or for living where I'm living. I can agree with this argument, though, as it's very likely that an online game experiences those issues. I had them in all the games I played. All of them. Always, even or especially after updates.
Argument 5: Bot Activity
Bots in ranked battles reduce fairness and skew outcomes.
That's why they're only allowed in Survival and Wild. And guess what - it's true. Bots are hard to beat. But that's also why Wild is only bringing half the rewards that modern gets. It's perfect to let a Bot run when your real life takes too much time to play down the energy.
And honestly, I love the fact that bots are allowed there. Yes, a bot is expensive, but that's also why it's only used my players with a high level deck. A deck that you would need anyway to compete at Diamond/Champion level in Wild. And once you paid that much money for a deck like that, another 30-60$ for a Bot to take off some of the workload is not that much.
Meaning: If you're a casual player, you'll probably never encounter bots. If you're not a casual player anymore, take it as a challenge - bots can be beat. Their win-rate is not 100%. And you can learn a lot from their teams, if you pay attention, which you should playing at those levels.
Argument 6: Poor Support
Slow or unresponsive customer support frustrates players with unresolved issues.
Yes, sometimes I agree with that. My requests usually got fixed pretty quickly, only one was left to die in the chat, but it was a bit out-of-scope anyway, very specific. The chatbot is quite useless at the moment, but at least it doesn't have you run in circles like other companies, instead it brings you to a human quite quickly.
And if chat fails, there's always discord. There are many channels where you can ask your questions, and probably will get an answer by this amazing community very quickly. Or write in official channels, though not labeled support, and even then there will be an answer. Only likely, as it's not the appropriate channel, but I used it for emergencies and it worked.
And never forget HIVE. The true support is in the community. That's where you find answers quickly.
Argument 7: Steep Learning Curve
Complex mechanics overwhelm newcomers unfamiliar with blockchain or card games.
Okay, yes, blockchain is hard to get into. A little more tutorial is needed there, and a little more obvious. I had a lot of trouble getting into it, but I didn't have LLMs available, either. Now, I just type a question about the HIVE Blockchain in by Brave browser and get the answer in seconds - and usually quite correct. Or at least with links that help.
Game play - sorry, that is just not the case. The low-level game mechanics are so easy and intuitive; the drag & drop and all that is very obvious and now also taught nicely with the Campaign-Mode. And from there, you can learn by yourself. Abilities and all that is easy when you start out, there's no overload at all.
You don't have to buy or rent max level cards from the beginning. Work your way up and you'll find out step by step, level by level, what is possible in Splinterlands - and the possibilities are somewhat endless now with Conclave Arcana.
Argument 8: Reward System Change
Updates to the reward system, like Glint and soulbound NFTs, devalue tradable rewards, frustrating players.
Yes, they do, but they enhance the newcomer experience. I often encounter teams that are entirely made up with Reward-Cards, except the rented summoner. But, and this is important - it also takes skill to get up to Diamond Modern with rented summoners and reward cards.
I think Glint was a great addition to the game, as a reward that can't be monetized. Replacing vouchers without repeating the mistakes. And that is a big plus for the game as well - the team learned and learns from their mistakes, thanks to an understanding, but also direct community. But I digress. The Glint shop is a great addition, in my opinion. Casual players find a lot of great items and also inspiration here. Glint can be used for many things without having to inject extra money. You can earn Glint right from the start, even in the Campaign. It's a very amazing new-player-experience, and it does benefit legacy players, too, with Energy and Titles and such.
Extra money is the short cut. Not an obligation.
Argument 9: High Competitive Costs
Expensive card rentals or purchases create barriers for budget players.
Yes and no. I repeat myself: If you want to compete, you have to put in money first. If you want to play casually, you can do that with little money and reward cards. Nobody forces you to compete with BT, Mondroid, EMP, Lorkus and all the other big shots. And honestly - even if you'd get a max deck for free, you'd still lose. It's not all about money, strategy counts so much and even more since Conclave Arcana.
If you're a budget player, then budget for the right deck. Either renting or buying or both. That's what budgeting is about, using what you have and making the most out of it.
Seriously, do you expect to spend $100 and make $1 every day of that? If any game offers you that, run.
Argument 10: Limited Non-Crypto Appeal
Blockchain focus alienates traditional gamers not interested in NFTs.
Traditional gamers? I don't even know what's meant by that. Surely, CoD players might not be interested in cards. Nor Poker players in SPL cards. But for the niche of TCG-players - I doubt that SPL alienates anyone.
Argument 11: Volatile Earnings
DEC and SPS value fluctuations reduce play-to-earn profitability.
P2E is a gimmick, and shouldn't be the main focus. And if you really see this fun game as more than a hobby, then take it as an investment in a high-growth company - they go up and down like crazy. They all fluctuate. Splinterlands is like that, and yes, their assets will go up and down. But the fun won't. Don't quit your job to play.
Argument 12: Delayed Roadmap
Slow progress on features like Land Expansion creates uncertainty for players.
But there is progress. Land 1.75 showed that. Midnight potions, lottery tickets and wagons show that. Land is becoming a bigger print in Splinterlands step by step. Not all at once, but slowly and steadily. Which gives us all great opportunity to buy more.
And yes, road maps are delayed in companies. It's not fun. But the game is working, the team is working, and money is coming in and being invested carefully. I can't remember how many times the Cybertruck was delayed, because nobody talked about it anymore after it was released. Land 2.0 is certainly not GTA 6, but that's just another example - it will come. Eventually. And we're better off than the GTA folks, as we can already use our land now.
Conclusion
Honestly, those arguments against Splinterlands made me even more bullish on the game and its assets. If that's all critics can come up with - awesome. There's no fundamental issue from what I see, nothing critical. Some things are just perspective, some are "normal" for games, and are constantly being worked on.
I know that there are more problems than those. I converse with a mate who is highly critical of many moves a lot of times, and his insight is very valuable. And he always lets the team know, too. And from what I see, feedback is taken seriously. Ideas are taken seriously. It seems like the team is taking it personal when something is not working, or when something is going wrong. That's a good attitude, to our benefit.
Thank you very much for reading, I hope you enjoyed it at least as much as I enjoyed writing :-D If you have any comments or feedback - please let me know! And don't forget to leave your own posts for me to curate. Thank you very much!
If you don't play the game yet, you can use my referral: Click here for referral :-)
Thanks for sharing! - @azircon

well done.
I summarized your argument 1 into a plot/infographics :)
I believe, anything can be plotted, or made a infographics out of.
Why am I not surprised? 🤣
Though in this case I'd say it's not so much a vs. situation, but a slide upwards. You can start as a Casual Player, and there are many stages until you are a competitive player. I'm in the middle at the moment, somewhat competitive, but not a high shot.
I went over to Mr Plot's post and read over that before coming back here to leave a comment.
If a game is fun, it is fun. I was once a massive player and (for a time) a contractor of Splinterlands. I divested (and resigned) because (at the time) I did not enjoy the direction being taken by the DAO.
People come, people go. The other positive is that no one is forcing anyone to play Splinterlands, or stay within the "community".
The DAO is another positive element. You can make change happen. :)
You may want to tell me. At the time I was one of the key individual influencing the changes.
I am still one of key individuals influencing the changes :)
It was one of my proposals that didn't get approved. It was a flywheel of sorts, I suppose. It was also my turning (away) point, both objectively and emotionally.
It was about the DAO staking a whole bunch of HBD, and using the interest to buy / burn DEC from the market. It was voted down, but now I believe there is a similar function.
I think I felt (and I shouldn't have) personally attacked by people who at the time saw it also as a threat to the stability of HBD / HIVE itself.
Here is that proposal. I do not know if it has aged well.
Looks like it was not the right time.
Looks like I did vote for it :)
Splinterlands, at least some of the players, remains anti-hive. Even some of the YouTubers and SL content creators. I have buttered them up by bribing or by threat over the years, so now they are much more in-line. But deep down the discomfort remains.
Finally we managed to get ourselves $250K funding from the Hive DHF. Took me massive amount of work.
Its a process.
You are only but a single individual. We all are. But as a collective, we are sometimes weaker than the one on one debates that can persuade others to alter their choices.
I am happy to be accused of being ahead of my time :D
A driven individual, or a small group of committed people can achieve a lot
In a way, we achieve a better and higher goal with hive DHF proposal.
See for yourself
https://peakd.com/@sps.dao/wallet
Also here:
https://peakd.com/@steemmonsters/wallet
Healthy. Is the HBD interest now compounding, or is it being used to fund ongoing prizing / development or as a market lever to do "buy-backs" etc?
It is compounding.
Excellent.
I could also ask my good friend, Mr Flesh Golems about this all as well. It has been too long since I've shared a meal with them. I am happy to look back upon the fun I had, and not with bitterness, but with all things, by choosing to devote attention to thing a, I am actively making the decision to neglect thing b.
Now that I'm unemployed and rather more "Free" with my time; I get to pay attention to many things, but not nearly all the things I'd like to, so I must continue to neglect some things so that I might love the other things.
He probably didn't tell you, as he a modest individual, but he is the "Chairman of the DAO" :) I kid you not. I say, I might have a hand in that too!
LOL
PS. it is mostly a position of liability and not power, but since we got ourselves a chance, why don't we mess with him, eh?
He knows where I live. I know where he lives. We can certainly mess with each other. The only thing is, we respect each other. He was even at my wedding. More dangerously, he was at my Buck's Night before the wedding.
Nobody needs to see those images. Nobody.
He has the position of power. There are always other elements.
Tagging @mattclarke so he can smile in the context of this conversation, and hopefully not publish those pictures.
In a way, you have to blame him for my presence anyway, he was the one that suggested I join (then STEEM) in the first place.
there is a saying here:
whatever happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas :)
He was a bit under the weather for the last few days/week.
Give him a visit, will you?
If he doesn't pull through, I have heard he has left instructions with his wife to contact me to sort out his crypto-affairs. 150KM round trip for the either of us to see each other in the flesh these days, opposite ends of the city.
We do have a monthly meet up, which I bitterly forgot about last month. My car goes in for repairs on the 29th, so I will have to catch the train to attend the next one.
I still feel like hammered crap, tbh; but a bit better than yesterday, which was a bit better than the day before.
No shit!
I had no idea this thing is still going around over there!
Thanks for reading both posts first! I, too, had stopped playing for a couple of years, and came back a year ago, just when the shift was happening. I'm now very happy with the new direction that the team is taking, that they seem to have learned from their mistakes and are trying to not repeat them. That will go a long way.
About the forcing part - correct, but some players are disheartened to see the value of their cards and assets having dropped so much. Which I can understand, it must not feel good. It's also why I always encourage people to see it as a game, and only a game, not an investment. That would take the fun away, at least for me.
I'm glad I didn't sell my few assets. Now it's really more fun than before :-)
I think I have 60 sps left. To the moon!
Those are going to be worth $600 one day!!!1!
Probably not, but if you still have the account, you can have a peak and see if you like how it's going now 😉
Congratulations @beelzael! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)
Your next target is to reach 250 posts.
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOP
Check out our last posts:
Delegate Tokens and HP to Fallen Angels to earn weekly rewards!
Delegate | Join to the guild
I believe that your points of criticism are all valid. There is still work to be done to improve Splinterlands. By the developers, but also by us, by the community.
But like you, I think the basics are right and we're on the right track.
And I see that work being done. I also think that there is no fast-lane, that it's better to do things step by step then rushing into it. The last releases, from Rebellian Reward cards over CA until the promo cards now have been very balanced. We'll see how the conflict cards go!
Really good arguments there, I understand people come at the game from different angles but in my opinion everyone needs to see this as a game and come to enjoy it, as a TCG player for 30+ years I have seen many games come and go and have the collection of cards to show for it, but as I watch Splinterlands evolve I enjoy it more and more! Yes you need to invest time/money to reach the top of the game (as with any game) but we are getting to the place where just opening an account can give you access to everything with foundation cards and practice modes.
And the great thing is that different opinions are welcomed, and a lot of times encouraged. Feedback seems to be taken seriously, and that is a good sign.
And I like the new possibilities for new players, too. Being able to test it, have a little bit of fun and see if it's working out. And then spend money if you know it's for you. It's an honest approach and I like that.
I wouldn't agree more than that. I'm 100% with you. Great post!!!!
Thank you! I'm happy you enjoyed it!
What pisses me off with splinterlands is that old cards have no use, they are trash as soon as they get out of modern... You gonna say "there is land!" I don't have land and I'm not interested in land I want to play with my cards, wild will not earn you enough to repay the wild pass unless you play diamond with full sps stake and win enough, I'm not gonna play at loss to use cards i paid already for... That teach me never to buy new cards or invest in it, my gf mylor taking dust was a good lesson... They should remove wild pass for human players as it was made for bots extraction or just ban the bots
That bot-fee is an interesting idea. Though I'm a bot user, I'm also always debating whether that's a good thing or a bad thing. It has a lot of perks, and the bot farms are mainly gone, thanks to the Wild-Pass, but as you say, that pass has a very negative effect, too - it's harder to break even. I play Wild with 150k staked SPS and make around 3-4 SPS per win, which translates to around 30 DEC per win, 360 DEC per day, so I'm good within 6 days - if I don't play modern in between.
I don't know how much cards were worth back in the days, as I wasn't playing. But I did see a surge in their value after Land 1.75, all across the board - even Chaos Legion, which was very surprising. So, even indirectly, you can benefit from Land by either renting the cards out or selling them.
That much for their worth - but I get that that is not the idea, either. Tournaments and brawls are still their, but not daily either, at least for wild. Survival has bots, too. So, yes, removing the Wild Pass for human players would be great, but I have no idea how that might be possible.