RE: Are We Winning the Debate or Losing Players
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
I am fine with this bracket if its already perfect in survival.
Team should retest and find a way to make survival booming first before bracket implemented in ranked. Otherwise it will change all player gameplay
Gameplay in this state i mean all (investing way, playing, buying, renting, and many things) since with even little change it can change the gameplay especially the player who think that this is assets (including me).
I do not like when team change suddenly and with super high pace.
I feel like what i do is not get anything and yet the system already changes.
Not only for the investing, for the gameplay also. For example, not all new ability from escalation got understand very well and yet soon rebellion switch to wild and need to learn for new set card again.
Even though i am scholaring high end account but still i am human that need time to learn
not robot that can learn fast in just a day to used all the new things.
But, cannot do anything since all decision based on the wealth and i am poor so like it or not need to follow it in the end or just leave
I understand what you mean. It can definitely be hard to keep up with how fast things sometimes change in the game. New sets, new abilities, new systems. It takes time for players to learn and adapt, especially if you are actively playing and managing accounts.
At the same time those changes also make things harder for bots as well. They usually adapt quickly, but every change does reset things a bit and forces everyone to learn again.
I also understand the feeling of not having much influence when you are a smaller player. That can be frustrating. But I still think it is important to stay part of the conversation and share your perspective. Sometimes when enough players explain their concerns the bigger stakeholders do listen.
From what I understand this proposal already reduces earnings for some of the bigger players as well, so in a way they are making sacrifices too. Many of them seem to support (or absence of vote) it because they believe it could be better for the long term health of the game.
In the end we all want the same thing, a healthy game that people keep playing and enjoying.